Euroscepticism on TikTok: Validating Automated Stance Inference in Reactions to the European Parliament
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n3p1017-1034Keywords:
Euroscepticism, TikTok communication, sentiment analysis, digital public sphere, co-commenting networksAbstract
How citizens respond to supranational institutions in emerging platform environments remains insufficiently understood, particularly on TikTok, where algorithmic curation, audio-visual formats, and comment-driven visibility reshape the dynamics of political engagement. Existing research has focused largely on party and media communication on Twitter and Facebook, offering limited insight into the everyday reactions surrounding EU institutional accounts. This study addresses this gap by analysing all 326 posts and 27,644 public comments published on the European Parliament’s official TikTok account between February 2024 and November 2025. Using multilingual transformer-based sentiment classification, zero-shot EU-stance detection, daily time-series modelling, and co-commenting network analysis, the article examines how sentiment, EU-related attitudes, and interactional structures jointly shape the digital visibility of Euroscepticism. The analysis reveals three core patterns. First, the attitudinal environment is structurally supportive: neutral and pro-EU reactions dominate, while explicit anti-EU comments represent a persistent yet small minority within subsets that explicitly reference the EU. Second, critical expression is temporally volatile. A composite indicator of euroscepticism pressure shows that negativity becomes politically salient only when heightened anti-EU shares coincide with elevated engagement, producing brief, event-bound spikes rather than sustained adversarial trajectories. Third, EU-critical users are structurally embedded within mixed, interactionally open comment spaces. They do not form cohesive clusters or central hubs but appear as diffuse minorities surrounded predominantly by neutral participants. These findings challenge assumptions of entrenched polarisation in digital arenas and underscore the need for platform-sensitive approaches to institutional communication. For EU institutions, the central challenge is less one of pervasive hostility than of anticipating and managing short, high-pressure intervals within otherwise broadly supportive publics.References
Alonso-Munoz, L., & Casero-Ripolles, A. (2020). Populism against europe in social media: The eurosceptic discourse on twitter in spain, italy, france, and united kingdom during the campaign of the 2019 european parliament election. In FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION (No. 54; Vol. 5). FRONTIERS MEDIA SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00054
Alonso-Munoz, L., & Casero-Ripolles, A. (2021). Looking for the guilty? The discursive strategy on twitter of the european populist political actors in times of crisis. In CULTURA LENGUAJE Y REPRESENTACION-REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS CULTURALES DE LA UNIVERSITAT JAUME I (Vol. 26, pp. 29–45). UNIV JAUME I, SERVEI COMUNICACIO PUBLICACIONS. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5827
Barberio, V., Kuric, I., Mollona, E., & Pareschi, L. (2020). The use of social media in EU policy communication and implications for the emergence of a European public sphere. In INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES-JOURNAL OF REGIONAL RESEARCH (Issues 46, SI, pp. 111–129). ASOC ESPANOLA CIENCIA REGIONAL-AECR.
Berti, C., & Loner, E. (2020). The 2019 european elections on twitter between populism, euroscepticism and nationalism: The case of italy. In SOCIETAMUTAMENTOPOLITICA-RIVISTA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA (Vol. 11, Issue 22, pp. 275–288). FIRENZE UNIV PRESS. https://doi.org/10.13128/smp-12654
Bouza, L., Oleart, A., & Tunon, J. (2019). Framing EU trade policy online: The case of @NoAlTTIP on Twitter. In COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY-SPAIN (Vol. 32, Issues 4, SI, pp. 257–273). UNIV NAVARRA, SERVICIO PUBLICACIONES. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.4.257-273
Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2016). First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate. In JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS (Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 159–174). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
D'Ambrosi, L., Parito, M., & Pasciuto, F. (2026). Young activists' communicative practices of resilience: The challenge of disinformation toward the 2024 European elections. PArtecipazione e COnflitto, 19(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19i1p77
Daniel, W. T., & Obholzer, L. (2025). Social media campaigning across multiple platforms: Evidence from the 2024 European elections. In WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS (Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 293–319). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2501464
Elshehawy, A., Gavras, K., Marinov, N., Nanni, F., & Schoen, H. (2022). Illiberal communication and election intervention during the refugee crisis in germany. In PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS (No. PII S1537592721003108; Vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 860–878). CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721003108
Fenoll, V. (2022). Third-order election. Spanish political parties’ communication on Facebook during the 2019 European Parliament election campaign. In PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION (No. e310306; Vol. 31, Issue 3). EDICIONES PROFESIONALES INFORMACION SL-EPI. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.06
Ferro-Santos, S., & Sepulveda, R. (2026). From Brussels to the "for you" page: Members of the European Parliament TikTok adoption and campaign use. Revista de Comunicacion, 25(1), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC25.1-2026-4303
Fortunato, P., & Pecoraro, M. (2022). Social media, education, and the rise of populist Euroscepticism. In HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS (No. 301; Vol. 9, Issue 1). SPRINGERNATURE. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01317-y
Kasekamp, A., Madisson, M.-L., & Wierenga, L. (2019). Discursive opportunities for the estonian populist radical right in a digital society. In PROBLEMS OF POST-COMMUNISM (Vol. 66, Issues 1, SI, pp. 47–58). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1445973
Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The two sides of Euroscepticism: Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003002
Ksenzenko, O. A. (2022). Post-truth, post-press, post-europe. Euroscepticism and the crisis of political communication. In MGIMO REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 279–292). MGIMO UNIV PRESS. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-279-292
Lovari, A., & Belluati, M. (2023). We are all Europeans. EU institutions facing the Covid-19 pandemic and information crisis. In G. La Rocca, M.-E. Carignan, & G. Boccia Artieri (Eds.), Infodemic Disorder: Covid-19 Coping Strategies in Europe, Canada and Mexico (pp. 65-96). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13698-6_4
Marchal, N., Neudert, L.-M., Kollanyi, B., & Howard, P. N. (2021). Investigating visual content shared over twitter during the 2019 EU parliamentary election campaign. In MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 158–170). COGITATIO PRESS. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3421
Meyer, C. (1999). Political legitimacy and the invisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union's communication deficit. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 617-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00199
Pane, S. (2026). Resilience in post-truth and post-digital European Union: Youth-led civil society organisations in the 2024 European elections. PArtecipazione e COnflitto, 19(1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19i1p94
Rivas-de-Roca, R., & Garcia-Gordillo, M. (2022). Brussels will pay for everything. The shaping of the European public sphere before NextGenerationEU. In PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION (No. e310301; Vol. 31, Issue 3). EDICIONES PROFESIONALES INFORMACION SL-EPI. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.01
Segesten, A. D., & Bossetta, M. (2019). The Eurosceptic Europeanization of public spheres: Print and social media reactions to the 2014 European Parliament elections. In COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS (Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 361–379). PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0099-5
Silva, B. C., Schuermann, L., & Proksch, S.-O. (2024). Modulation of democracy: Partisan communication during and after election campaigns. In BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (Vol. 54, Issue 2, pp. 339–354). CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123423000169
Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2002). Europeanisation, Euroscepticism and party systems: Party-based Euroscepticism in the candidate states of Central and Eastern Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850208438827
Vochocova, L., & Rosenfeldova, J. (2023). The EU as a weak and authoritative traitor: Signs of post-socialist ressentiment and populist rhetoric in online civic anti-European discourses. In JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN STUDIES (Vol. 31, Issues 3, SI, pp. 916–928). ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2092460
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with PACO agree to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non commercial-Share alike 4.0 Italian License
Copyrights of each article are hold by the University of Salento.
PACO allows author(s) to retain publishing rights under permission of the Editorial Staff. But Authors are requested to always indicate that the first version of the article has been published in "Partecipazione e conflitto".
