The Battle for Memory in the 2019 Chilean Social Outburst: Infra-repression, transitional vacuum, and the Rearticulation of Counter-memories

Authors

  • Lidia Angelina Yáñez Lagos University of Manchester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n2p539-557

Keywords:

Chile, Social Uprising, Hidden transcripts, Counter-memories, Soft Repression, Transitions to democracy

Abstract

Taking the 2019 Chilean social outburst as a case study, this article examines struggles over memory in post-authoritarian Chile. It analyses how official memory constrains how the past can be articulated, shaping political subjectivities and discouraging engagement, while also exploring how demonstrators resist and rework counter-memories during the mobilization. The article is structured in two parts. The first, drawing on James Scott, conceptualises official memory as part of a transitional transcript that functions as a form of infra-repression by demobilising dissent. Building on scholarship that has highlighted the role of transitional memory projects in stabilizing post-authoritarian elites, this dynamic is examined in the Chilean transition, particularly through the Concertación’s mnemonic project and its role in containing dissent after the dictatorship. The second part presents an abductive thematic analysis of forty semi-structured interviews with uprising participants, revealing three main processes. First, prior to the uprising, participants’ socialization was marked by a “transitional vacuum” in which primary socialization spaces failed to provide opportunities to thematize the past, potentially discouraging engagement while also prompting the search for alternative memories. Second, during the mobilizations, police brutality fractured the transitional narrative and the uprising functioned as a social space where counter-memories were reworked through collective assemblies, conversations with families, and self-directed information practices. Finally, in the post-uprising period, public discourse shifted toward more conservative framings, a development that does not indicate hegemonic consensus but instead propels the retreat of counter-memories into hidden transcripts. By theorising memory as infra-repression and analysing the interaction between official and counter-memories at the micro-level, this article sheds light on how repression and resistance operate within societies shaped by authoritarian legacies. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing and studying hidden forms of resistance, particularly in contexts of rising authoritarianism and far-right threats.

Author Biography

Lidia Angelina Yáñez Lagos, University of Manchester

is a sociologist and PhD candidate in Sociology at the University of Manchester whose research explores how activists and demonstrators resist police violence and how memory shapes these processes in the Chilean social outburst. Drawing from activist and feminist perspectives, she is interested in producing politically engaged theory and knowledge from the Global South. She currently works as a Teaching Assistant at the University of Manchester and is part of the organising committee of the Alternative Futures and Popular Protest conference.

References

Abozaid, A. M. (2025) ‘Violence as a constitutive of states’, International Political Sociology.

Adler, N. (2012) ‘Reconciliation with – or rehabilitation of – the Soviet past?’, Memory Studies, 5(3), pp. 327–338.

Alcántara-Lizárraga, J. Á. and Jima-González, A. (2024) ‘Digital manipulation and mass mobilisation over the long run: Evidence from Latin America’, Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1296004.

Alexander, J. C. (2004) ‘Toward a cultural theory of trauma’, in Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J. and Sztompka, P. (eds.) Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–30.

Amnesty International (2023) Interactive map reveals state sanctioned violence against protesters worldwide. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/09/interactive-map-reveals-state-sanctioned-violence-against-protesters-worldwide/ (Accessed: [Insertar fecha de consulta]).

Anisin, A. (2016) ‘Repression, spontaneity, and collective action: The 2013 Turkish Gezi protests’, Journal of Civil Society, 12(4), pp. 411–429. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1239607.

Assmann, A. (2008) ‘Canon and archive’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.) Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 97–107.

Badilla Rajevic, M. (2020) ‘When a social movement quarantines: The power of urban memory in the 2019 Chilean anti-neoliberal uprising’, Space and Culture, 23(3), pp. 286–292.

Bayat, A. (2021) ‘The Arab Spring and revolutionary theory: An intervention in a debate’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 34(2), pp. 393–400.

Belmonte, A. and Rochlitz, M. (2019) ‘The political economy of collective memories: Evidence from Russian politics’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 168, pp. 229–250.

Bernard, H. R. (2013) Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Bernard, H. R. and Ryan, G. W. (2009) Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Bevins, V. (2023) If we burn: The mass protest decade and the missing revolution. London: Hachette UK.

Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.

Bueno, N. (2021) ‘Different mechanisms, same result: Remembering the liberation war in Mozambique’, Memory Studies, 14(5), pp. 1018–1034.

Cabrera, J. (2023) ‘Trauma transgeneracional y posmemoria entre nietos de víctimas de la dictadura chilena’, Revista de Estudios Sociales, (84), pp. 59–76.

Collins, C., Hite, K. and Joignant, A. (eds.) (2013) The politics of memory in Chile: From Pinochet to Bachelet. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Cortés, S., Martínez, M. S. and Anríquez, S. (2022) ‘Vulneración de derechos humanos en las movilizaciones de octubre de 2019 en Chile’, Gaceta Sanitaria, 35, pp. 399–401.

Dammert, L., Elorrieta, F. and Alda, E. (2021) ‘Satisfaction with the Police in Chile: The Importance of Legitimacy and Fair Treatment’, Latin American Politics and Society, 63(4), pp. 124–145. doi: 10.1017/lap.2021.40.

Daphi, P. and Zamponi, L. (2019) ‘Exploring the movement-memory nexus: Insights and ways forward’, Mobilisation: An International Quarterly, 24(4), pp. 399–417.

Davenport, C. (2005) ‘Repression and mobilisation: Insights from political science and sociology’, in Davenport, C., Johnston, H. and Mueller, C. (eds.) Repression and mobilisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–32.

Earl, J. (2011) ‘Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control’, Annual Review of Sociology, 37, pp. 261–284.

Earl, J. and Braithwaite, J. M. (2022) ‘Layers of political repression: Integrating research on social movement repression’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18, pp. 227–248.

Ferree, M. (2004) ‘Soft repression: Ridicule, stigma, and silencing in gender-based movements’, in Myers, D. J. and Cress, D. M. (eds.) Authority in contention. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 85–101.

Foucault, M. (1978) The history of sexuality volume I. London: Routledge.

Foxen, P. (2000) ‘Cacophony of voices: A K’iche’ Mayan narrative of remembrance and forgetting’, Transcultural Psychiatry, 37(3), pp. 355–381.

Fundación Chile 21 (2020) Legitimidad de Carabineros no repunta: Estudio de Chile 21 refleja pérdida sostenida en la confianza policial con un 61% de rechazo. Available at: https://www.chile21.cl (Accessed: [November 23]).

García, O. J. M. (2014) ‘Soft repression and the current wave of social mobilisations in Spain’, Social Movement Studies, 13(2), pp. 303–308.

García-Perdomo, V., Magaña, M. I., Hernández-Rodríguez, J. C. and Ventín-Sánchez, J. A. (2023) ‘Engaging social media audiences with riots: TV and newspapers’ coverage of the 2019 protests in Colombia and Chile’, International Communication Gazette, 86(8), pp. 607–632.

Gramsci, A. (2020) ‘Selections from the prison notebooks’, in The applied theatre reader. London: Routledge, pp. 141–142. [Originally published 1971].

Grodsky, B. (2007) ‘Producing truth: The politics of investigating past human rights violations in post-communist states’, World Affairs, 169(3), pp. 125–133.

Gunzelmann, H. J. (2024) ‘Counter-surveillant organizing during the secessionist cycle of contention in Catalonia’, Social Movement Studies, 23(5), pp. 623–639.

Habermas, J. (1985) The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

Halbwachs, M. (1992) On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Originally published 1925].

Henríquez, K., Pinochet Mendoza, N. A., Pleyers, G. and Cuestas, F. S. (2025) ‘Social movements as triggers of transgenerational transmission of trauma and memory in Chile’, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 14(2), pp. 56–67. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.3904.

Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.) (1983) The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huyssen, A. (2003) Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Jämte, J. and Ellefsen, R. (2020) ‘The consequences of soft repression’, Mobilisation: An International Quarterly, 25(3), pp. 383–404.

Jara Ibarra, C. (2019) (Des)movilización de la sociedad civil chilena: post-trauma, gobernabilidad y neoliberalismo (1990-2010). Santiago: Ariadna Ediciones.

Jelin, E. (2003) State repression and the labors of memory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Johnston, H. (2016) ‘Dimensions of culture in social movement research’, in Inglis, D. and Almila, A.-M. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of cultural sociology. London: Sage, pp. 414–428.

Joignant, A., Garretón, M., Somma, N. and Campos, T. (2020) Informe anual observatorio de conflictos 2020. Santiago: COES.

Kovras, I. (2013) ‘Explaining prolonged silences in transitional justice: The disappeared in Cyprus and Spain’, Comparative Political Studies, 46(6), pp. 730–756.

Marszałek-Kawa, J. and Wawrzyński, P. (2016) ‘Remembrance, identity politics and political transitions: A comparative study’, Polish Political Science Yearbook, 45(1), pp. 11–21.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1967) The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin. [Originally published 1848].

Melucci, A. (1989) Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson Radius.

Miliband, R. (1990) ‘Counter-hegemonic struggles’, Socialist Register, 26.

Mouffe, C. (2018) For a left populism. London: Verso Books.

Pleyers, G. (2024) El cambio nunca es lineal: Movimientos sociales en tiempos polarizados. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

Pollak, M. (2006) Memoria, olvido, silencio. La producción social de identidades frente a situaciones límite. La Plata: Ediciones Al Margen.

Polletta, F. and Jasper, J. M. (2001) ‘Collective identity and social movements’, Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), pp. 283–305.

Proust, V. and Saldaña, M. (2022) ‘Another violent protest? New perspectives to understand protest coverage’, Media and Communication, 10(4), pp. 18–29.

Riaño, P. and Uribe, M. V. (2016) ‘Constructing memory amidst war: The Historical Memory Group of Colombia’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), pp. 6–24.

Rigney, A. (2016) ‘Cultural memory studies: Mediation, narrative, and the aesthetic’, in Tota, A. L. and Hagen, T. (eds.) Routledge international handbook of memory studies. London: Routledge, pp. 65–76.

Schwartz, B. (1996) ‘Memory as a cultural system: Abraham Lincoln in World War II’, American Sociological Review, 61(5), pp. 908–927.

Scott, J. C. (1990) Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Siavelis, P. M. (2009) ‘Enclaves de la transición y democracia chilena’, Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 29(1), pp. 3–21.

Snow, D. A. and Benford, R. D. (1988) ‘Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilisation’, International Social Movement Research, 1, pp. 197–217.

Stern, S. J. (2009) Reckoning with Pinochet: The memory question in democratic Chile, 1989–2006. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Thomas, G. (2017) How to do your research project: A guide for students. 3rd edn. London: Sage.

Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I. (2012) ‘Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis’, Sociological Theory, 30(3), pp. 167–186.

Valdivia, V., Álvarez, R. and Pinto, J. (2006) Su revolución contra nuestra revolución: Izquierdas y derechas en el Chile de Pinochet (1973–1981). Santiago: LOM Ediciones.

Valdivia Ortiz de Zárate, V. (2012) La alcaldización de la política: Los municipios en la dictadura pinochetista. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.

Weber, M. (1946) ‘Politics as a vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds.) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–128. [Originally published 1919].

Downloads

Published

29-06-2026

How to Cite

Yáñez Lagos, L. A. (2026). The Battle for Memory in the 2019 Chilean Social Outburst: Infra-repression, transitional vacuum, and the Rearticulation of Counter-memories. PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 19(2), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n2p539-557

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.