Financial Control as Soft Repression: The Islamic Civil Society in France Reacting to 2021’s Law Against Separatism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n2p599-620Keywords:
Financial Control, Infrapolitics, Islamic Civil Society, Muslims, Soft repressionAbstract
After Daesh terrorist attacks, the French State reinforced its securitarian policies, targeting – among others - Muslim associations (Kaya, 2011). The “War on Terror” has been accompanied by restrictions on civil liberties in the name of rapid and preventive repression (Vedaschi & Graziani, 2019). Yet repression does not operate solely through visible coercion. Alongside the use of force, authorities deploy less visible strategies aimed at weakening Civil Society organizations (Talpin, 2016). Among these, financial control constitutes a central mechanism of soft repression, understood as a non-violent form of repression that reduces the capacity for contestation available to subaltern actors. In France, where the non-profit sector is largely dependent on public funding (Archambault et al., 2013), the State can use budgetary resources as leverage. Authorities often mobilize discourses of “budgetary constraint” to pressure organizations into compliance or to fragment mobilization by fostering competition over scarce funds (Talpin & Bonneville, 2023). In extreme cases, security-related justifications are invoked to freeze organizations’ bank accounts, like after the introduction of the Law Against Separatism (2021) – later renamed Law Concerning the Respect of Republican Principles. Drawing on qualitative interviews with leaders of four Muslim associations, this paper addresses the following research questions: How and when does the French State enact soft repression through financial control over Muslim associations? How do targeted associations react? By analyzing both State strategies and the responses of affected organizations, before and after 2021’s law, the paper highlights how soft repression is deployed and when it prompts adaptive, infrapolitical, reactions by Muslim associations.
References
Ajala, I. (2021). France’s anti-separatism law is increasing the securitisation of Muslims. Opinion Paper. Melbourne Asian Review. https://www.melbourneasiareview.edu.au/frances-anti-separatism-law-is-increasing-the-securitisation-of-muslims/?print=pdf
Amghar, S. (2008). Europe puts Islamists to the test: The Muslim Brotherhood (France, Belgium and Switzerland). Mediterranean Politics, 13(1), p. 63–77.
Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33(Winter), p.1–4.
Avallone, G. (2018). Liberare le Migrazioni. Lo sguardo eretico di Abdelmalek Sayad. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Bechrouri, I. (2023). ‘L’esprit de défense’: separatism, counterinsurgency and the dissolution of the Collective Against Islamophobia in France. Modern & Contemporary France, 31(2), p. 199-218.
Bechrouri, I., (2014). L’impact des politiques de surveillance post-11 septembre sur les communautés musulmanes : l’exemple du NYPD. Politique Américaine, n°24, p. 61-85.
Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331-347.
Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D., 1981. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), p.141–163.
Blokker, P. (Ed.). (2022). Imagining Europe: Transnational contestation and civic populism. Springer Nature.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television. New York: The New Press.
Boykoff, J. (2007). Beyond Bullets: The Suppression of Dissent. AK Press: California.
Brechenmacher, S., & Carothers, T. (2019). Defending civic space: Is the international community stuck?. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
Chaudhry, S. (2022). The assault on civil society: Explaining state crackdown on NGOs. International Organization, 76(3), p. 549-590.
Chaudhry, S. & Heiss, A. (2021). Dynamics of international giving: how heuristics shape individual donor preferences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(3), p.481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020971045
Corbetta, P. (2010). Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. London & New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Davenport, C. (2005). Repression and Mobilization. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.
Davenport, C. (2015). Collaborative Research: An Organizational Approach to State Repression. Working Paper. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1555460
Dazey, M. (2019). Pan-Islamic ideals and national loyalties: Competing attachments amongst early Muslim activists in France.
De Goede, M. (2017). Carnival of money: Politics of dissent in an era of globalizing finance. In Social Movements (pp. 84-103). Routledge India.
De Goede, M. (2008). The politics of preemption and the war on terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 161-185.
De Koker, L., and Casanovas, P. (2024). ‘De-Risking’, De-Banking and Denials of Bank Services: An Over-Compliance Dilemma?. In Financial Crime, Law and Governance: Navigating Challenges in Different Contexts, pp. 45-70.
Delfini, A., Elfaouz, N., and Talpin, J. (2021). Domestiquer la critique. La restriction des libertés associatives dans la France contemporaine. Délibérée, 14(3), 51-57.
Dupuy, K., Fransen, L., and Prakash, A. (2021). Restricting NGOs: From Pushback to Accommodation. Global Policy, 12(5).
Earl, J. (2006). Pursuing Social Change Online The Use of Four Protest Tactics on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review. Volume 24, Number 3 (Fall 2006). p. 362-377. DOI 10.1177/0894439305284627
Earl, J. (2011). Political repression: Iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, p. 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102609
Earl, J. (2013). Spreading the Word or Shaping the Conversation: “Prosumption” in Protest Websites. In: Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Edited by Coy). Emerald Books. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2013)0000036004
European Civic Forum (2024) Civic Space Report 2024: Europe experiencing a dangerous rollback of civic freedoms. Brussels.
Fallon, K.M., Aunio, A., Kim, J. (2018). Decoupling International Agreements from Domestic Policy: The State and Soft Repression. Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 40, Number 4, November 2018, p. 932-961 (Article). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0050
Faure, L. (2021). L’humanitaire islamique et les ONG musulmanes en France : quels registres de mobilisation ?. L’Année du Maghreb, Vol. 25. p. 223-243. DOI https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.8119
Ferree, M. M. (2005). Soft repression: Ridicule, stigma, and silencing in gender-based movements. Authority in Contention: Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 25, p. 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-786X(04)25004-2
Fredette, J. (2014). Constructing Muslims in France. Discourse, Public Identity, and the politics of citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Frégosi, F. (2020, 23 novembre). Vers un islam officiel… certifié républicain ? Libération, p. 22.
Fritsch, K. (2025). “It can hit anybody”: Protest actors’ frames of repression during times of states of emergency in France. Kriminologisches Journal, 57(1).
Gabor, E. (2024). How Civil Societies Are Undermined: An Analysis of Factors That Endanger Civic Freedoms. Civil Szemle, 21(2), 47-65.
Garfinkel, H., 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gazagne-Jammes, V. (2022). Réflexions sur l’intitulé initial de la loi sur le respect des principes de la République, dite Loi contre le séparatisme et « les atteintes à la citoyenneté ». La Revue des droits de l’homme, 22. https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.15203
Geisser, V. (2021). Un séparatisme « venu d’en haut »: Rhétorique identitaire pour élites en mal de légitimité populaire. Migrations Société, 33(183), p. 3–15.
Georgeault, L. (2022). Loi de renforcement du respect des principes de la République en France: Le retour de l’assimilationnisme? Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, (22), p.79–100. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2022.6808
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. & trans. Q. Hoare & G.N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Hanafi, R., Timera, M. B., Bousso, S., & Bruneaud, J. F. (2025). Islamic religious education and state school policies in France and Senegal. British Journal of Religious Education, p. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2474518
Hennette Vauchez, S. (2019). La fabrique législative de l’état d’urgence: lorsque le pouvoir n’arrête pas le pouvoir. Cultures & conflits, (113), p. 17-41.
Honari, A. (2017). Responses To Repression. Sociopedia.
Human Rights Watch (2026) World Report 2026: France. New York: HRW.
Jämte, J., & Ellefsen, R. (2020). The consequences of soft repression. Mobilization: An International Journal, 25(3), p. 383–404. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-25-3-383
Kaya, A. (2011). Islamophobia as a Form of Governmentality: Unbearable Weightiness of the Politics of Fear. Willy Brandt Series of Working Papers in International Migration and Ethnic Relations, 1(11).
Kang, S. Lee, S. Whang, T. (2023). Economic sanctions, repression capacity, and human rights. Journal of Human Rights. 22(2), p. 174-197.
Khemilat, F. (2023). La loi contre le « séparatisme » : Mort et résurrection d’une « justice d’exception ». Modern & Contemporary France. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2023.2176838
Kühle, L., & Lindekilde, L. (2010). Radicalization among young Muslims in Aarhus. The Centre for Studies in Islamism and Radicalisation & Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.
Maréchal, B. (2015). The historical and contemporary sociology of the European Muslim Brotherhood movement and its logics of action. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 4(2), p. 223–257.
Massoumi, N. (2021). The Role of Civil Society in Political Repression: The UK Prevent Counter-Terrorism Programme. Sociology, Vol. 55(5), p. 959–977. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038521996977
Matthews, T. (2022). The Politics of Protest and Gender: Women Riding the Wings of Resistance. Social Sciences 11, no. 2: 52. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020052
Mattoni, A. (2014). The potentials of grounded theory in the study of social movements. Methodological practices in social movement research, 21-42.
Merriam, S.B., 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messner, F. (2022). Conforter la « laïcité » et organiser les cultes. Un paradoxe français. La loi du 24 août 2021. Anuario de Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado, 38, 587–608.
Mitchell, D., & Staeheli, L. A. (2005). Permitting protest: Parsing the fine geography of dissent in America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), p.796–813.
Moalla, S., & Cozma, A. M. (2023). A comparison of the French, English, and Arabic discourses on France 24 regarding freedom of expression and Islam. French Journal for Media Research, 18.
Noy, C., (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), p.327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
Coercion and Relational Repression in China. China Review, Volume 17, Number 2, June 2017, p. 179-201.
Pinson, G. (2010). Des métropoles ingouvernables aux métropoles oligarchiques. Territoires 2040: revue d’études et de prospective, 2010, Aménager le changement, 1, p.65-69. DOI halshs-00653922
Rak, J., & Owczarek, K. (2022). Theoretical approaches towards soft repressions and social mobilization: Lessons learnt from Asian and regional studies. Asia–Pacific Review, 25(1), https://doi.org/10.15805/ap2022.1.04
Raison du Cleuziou, Y. (2010). La domination et les arts de la résistance. Fragments du discours subalterne. Études rurales, 186, p. 227–233.
Roy, O. (2023). Why Extremism?. In: Activist and Islamist Radicalism: Anger and Anxiety (Ed: Kaya, Benevento, Koca). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003309840-14
Scott, J.C., 2018. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smidt, H. Perera, D. Mitchell, NJ. Bakke, KM. (2021). Silencing Their Critics: How Government Restrictions Against Civil Society Affect International ‘Naming and Shaming.’ British Journal of Political Science. 2021;51(3):1270-1291. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000693
Szukala, A. (2023). Civic education and defensive republicanism in France after the assassination of Samuel Paty. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 22(1).
Talpin, J., Bonnevalle, P. (2023). Financements associatifs et pouvoir local : Enquête sur les subventions aux associations dans une ville du Nord. Gouvernement et action publique, 12(2), p. 37-64.
Talpin, J., O'Miel, J., & Frégosi, F. (2017). L’Islam et la cité. Engagements musulmans dans les quartiers populaires. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaire du Septentrion.
Tilly, C. & Tarrow, S.G. (2015). Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vedaschi, A., & Graziani, C. (2019). National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: Past, present and future. DPCE Online, 39(1), p. 749–773.
Wood, L. J. (2007). Breaking the wave: Repression, identity, and Seattle tactics. Mobilization: The International Quarterly, 12(4), p. 377–388.
Worrall, A. (2019). Troubled or Troublesome? Justice for Girls and Young Women. In Youth Justice (pp. 28-50). Routledge.
Yang, Y., Kim-Leffingwell, S., Shen, S., & Gong, D. Y. (2023). Killing Protests with Kindness: Anti-China Protests and China's Public Diplomacy. International Studies Quarterly, 67(4).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with PACO agree to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non commercial-Share alike 4.0 Italian License
Copyrights of each article are hold by the University of Salento.
PACO allows author(s) to retain publishing rights under permission of the Editorial Staff. But Authors are requested to always indicate that the first version of the article has been published in "Partecipazione e conflitto".
