Acting as Autonomous and Complementary Partners. Conflictual Cooperation in Quebec’s Youth Concertation

Authors

  • Marie Lefebvre University of Montreal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n2p580-598

Keywords:

advocacy, autonomous community movement, depoliticization, indirect repression, nonprofit/state relations

Abstract

In Quebec, “autonomous community organizations” are involved in the public health and social services network as autonomous and complementary partners. This partnership appears paradoxical, given that the movement claims an advocacy role vis-à-vis the state. It illustrates what Lamoureux (1994) describes as a relation of “conflictual cooperation” between the state and community organizations. How do actors navigate between cooperation with public institutions and conflict when necessary? Drawing on an ethnography conducted in two youth concertation tables, this article highlights the tensions inherent in conflictual cooperation and examines the conditions under which contestation can still be voiced by community actors. While concertation is framed as a site for collaboration, it also discourages community actors from “making things political” (Eliasoph and Lichterman 2018) by limiting their ability to challenge power relations with public institutions. The article argues that the absence of overt conflict in the performance of concertation often results less from alignment than from subtle control tactics – whether intentional or not – that channel and constrain dissent, although protest can still be reconfigured both backstage and outside concertation.

Author Biography

Marie Lefebvre, University of Montreal

is a PhD candidate in political science at the Université de Montréal. She is a member of CAPED (Collectif de recherche action politique et démocratie) and CPDS (Centre de recherche sur les politiques et le développement social). Her research focuses on the autonomous community movement in Quebec and explores processes of politicization within the sector, drawing on an ethnographic study conducted in youth centers. She is the author of "Résistance à la marchandisation et contestation : les relations partenariales en tension entre État et organismes communautaires autonomes au Québec" in Revue Française des Affaires Sociales (2023).

References

Alexander J., R. Nank, and C. Stivers (1999), “Implications of welfare reform : do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society?”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4): 452-475.

Alinsky S. D. (1946), Reveille for Radicals, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bacqué, M.-H., and C. Biewener (2013). L’empowerment, une pratique émancipatrice ?, Paris : La Découverte.

Bourque, D., Y. Comeau, L. Favreau and L. Fréchette (2007), L’organisation communautaire, fondements, approches et champs de pratique, Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Bourque, D. (2008). Concertation et partenariat : Entre levier et piège du développement des communautés. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Bourque, D., and C. Jetté (2018). “Nouvelle gestion publique et les rapports entre l’État et le secteur communautaire”, in J. Grenier and M. Bourque (eds.), Les services sociaux à l’ère managériale, Quebec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, pp. 149 176.

Carrel, M., and J. Talpin (2012). “Cachez ce politique que je ne saurais voir !: Ethnographie des conseils de quartier roubaisiens”, Participations, 4(3), 179 206.

Carrel, M. (2015). “Politicization and publicization: The fragile effects of deliberation in working-class districts”. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(3 4), 189 210.

Chaves, M., L. Stephens and J. Galaskiewicz (2004), “Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofits’ Political Activity?”, American Sociological Review, 69(2): 292 316.

Chevallier, T. (2022), “Financements publics et limitation de l’autonomie des associations dans les quartiers populaires”, Sociologie, 13(4): 439-459.

Chevallier, T. (2023), “Toward a depoliticising civic style. How public-led partnership life socialises the leaders of an association in a French deprived neighbourhood”, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 10(3): 429-456.

Codaccioni, V. (2019), “(Se) faire justice”, Délibération, 6(1): 48-52.

Darby, S. (2016). “Dynamic Resistance : Third-Sector Processes for Transforming Neoliberalization”, Antipode, 48(4), 977 999.

Dhume, F. (2001), Du travail social au travail ensemble, le partenariat dans le champ des politiques sociales, Paris: Ed. ASH.

Donaldson, L. P. (2007), “Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies: Organizational factors as correlates to advocacy behavior”, Journal of Community Practice, 15: 139–158.

Duchesne, S. and F. Haegel (2007). “Avoiding or Accepting Conflict in Public Talk”, British Journal of Political Science, 37: 1-22.

Earl, J. (2011), “Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control”, Annual Review of Sociology, 37: 261-284.

Earl, J. (2013), “Repression and Social Movements”, in D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, D. McAdam (eds.), The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1083-1089.

Earl, J. and S. A. Soule (2010), “The Impacts of Repression: The Effect of Police Presence and Action on Subsequent Protest Rates,” in P. G. Coy (ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, pp. 75–113.

Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics. How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.

Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers. Civic life after Welfare’s End. Princeton University Press.

Eliasoph, N. and P. Lichterman (2018), “Making things political”, in L. Grindstaff, M.-C. M. Lo, J. R. Hall (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Cultural Sociology, London: Routledge, pp. 469-477.

Fauvel, M., Y. Noiseux, and O. Couspeyre (2024), “Conditions de travail et d’emploi dans le mouvement communautaire: enquête sur les répercussions des politiques publiques et des pratiques de gestion en temps de pandémie”, GIREPS.

Ferree, M. M. (2004), “Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-Based Movements”, in D. J. Myers and D. M. Cress, Authority in Contention, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 85–101.

Flinders, M. and J. Buller (2006), “Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools”, British Politics, 1: 293-318.

Fontaine, A. (2013). “La quête d’autonomie de l’action communautaire au Québec, Mission ou illusion collective ?”, Le Sociographe, 5(6): 205 219.

Fournier, D., J.-F. René, M. Duval, S. Garon, A. Fontaine, J. Chénard, and C. Lefebvre (2001), “La dynamique partenariale sur les pratiques des organismes communautaires dans le contexte de la réorganisation du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux”, Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 14(1): 111-131.

Goffman, E., (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, NY: Doubleday Editions.

Guay, L. (1999), Pour un mouvement communautaire citoyen. Regroupement des organismes communautaires des Laurentides.

Hamidi, C. (2006). “Elements pour une approche interactionniste de la politisation”, Revue française de science politique, 56(1): 5-25.

Hamidi, C. (2022), “Cherry Picking and Politics: Conceptualizing Ordinary Forms of Politicization”, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 36: 57-75.

Heinkelmann-Wild, T., B. Zangl, B. Rittberger, and L. Kriegmair (2021), “Blame shifting and blame obfuscation : The blame avoidance effects of delegation in the European Union”, European Journal of Political Research, 62(1): 221-238.

Jämte, J. and R. Ellefsen (2020), “The Consequences of Soft Repression”, Mobilization: An International Journal, 25(3): 383-404.

Jetté, C. (2011), “The role of community organizations in the transformation of the social development model in Québec”. Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research, 2(1), 61-74.

Jetté, C., and J.-V. Bergeron-Gaudin (2020), “Innovation sociale et travail institutionnel : Le rôle des organismes communautaires dans l’évolution des politiques sociales au Québec”, Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 11(1), 43-61.

Kettl, D. F. (2002), The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

Lachapelle, R. (2001), “Deux décennies de concertation, le partenariat en développement local à Sorel”, Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 14(1): 48 63.

Laforest, R. (2006), “State and community sector relations: Crisis and challenges in Quebec”, The Philanthropist, 20(4): 171-184.

Lamoureux, J. (1994), Le partenariat à l’épreuve : L’articulation paradoxale des dynamiques institutionnelles et communautaires dans le domaine de la santé mentale. Montreal: Editions Saint-Martin.

Lichterman, P. (2021), How civic action works: Fighting for housing in Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lichterman, P. and N. Eliasoph (2014), “Civic action”, American Journal of Sociology, 120(3): 798-863.

Lipsky, M. and S. R. Smith (1989), “Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state”, Political Science Quarterly, 104(4): 625-648.

Luhtakallio, E. (2012). Practicing Democracy Local Activism and Politics in France and Finland. Palmgrave Macmillan.

Maddison, S., R. Denniss, and C. Hamilton (2004), “Silencing Dissent. Non-government organisations and Australian democracy”, Discussion Paper 65, The Australian Institute, pp. 1-80.

Mosley, J. E. (2012), “Keeping the Lights On: How Government Funding Concerns Drive the Advocacy Agendas of Nonprofit Homeless Service Providers”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22: 841-866.

Panet-Raymond, J. (1989), “The Future of Community Groups in Quebec: The Difficult Balance Between Autonomy and Partnership with the State”, Canadian Social Work Review, 6(1): 126-135.

Patsias, C., J. Durazo Hermann and S. Patsias (2019). “The steep and slippery slope of politics : Civic spirit, empowerment, and politicisation in citizen committees”, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 6(1): 95 123.

Peterson, A. and M. Wahlström (2014), “Repression: The Governance of Domestic Dissent”, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 634-652.

Proulx, J., D. Bourque and S. Savard (2007), “The Government–Third Sector Interface in Québec”, Voluntas 18: 293–307.

Rudrappa, S. (2004). Ethnic routes to becoming American: Indian immigrants and the cultures of citizenship. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Salamon, L. M. (1995), Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

Scott, J. C. (1990), Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Hidden Transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sénécal, G., G. Cloutier, Méthé-Myrand, L., Dubé, A. and A. Chevalier (2010). Les effets de la concertation : Étude sur les Tables intersectorielles de quartier de Montréal. Montréal: INRS Centre - Urbanisation Culture Société.

Smith, S. R. (2010), “Nonprofits and public administration. Reconciling performance management and citizen engagement”, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(2): 129-152.

Smith, S. R., and M. Lipsky (1993), Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

Talpin, J. (2016), “Une répression à bas bruit. Comment les élus étouffent les mobilisations dans les quartiers populaires”, Métropolitiques.

Thériault, V. (2019). “Accountability literacies and conflictual cooperation in community-based organisations for young people in Québec”, in L. Tett and M. Hamilton (eds.), Resisting Neoliberalism in Education: Local, National and Transnational Perspectives, Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 13 26.

White, D. (1994), “La gestion communautaire de l’exclusion”, Lien social et Politiques, (32): 37-49.

White, D. (2012), “Interest representation and organisation in civil society: Ontario and Quebec compared”, British Journal of Canadian Studies, 25(2): 199-229.

Downloads

Published

29-06-2026

How to Cite

Lefebvre, M. (2026). Acting as Autonomous and Complementary Partners. Conflictual Cooperation in Quebec’s Youth Concertation. PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 19(2), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v19n2p580-598

Similar Articles

<< < 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.