Impolitic Gambling. Chance and Inequality in Contemporary Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i2p569Keywords:
Gambling, Depoliticization, Risk, Chance factor, Second Italian RepublicAbstract
The liberalization of gambling is a measure equally taken and implemented by both sides with-in the bipolar system that typified Italian politics over the years 1990-2000. For 25 years, the growing number of operators, players and betting opportunities has been blessed as a "necessity", a forced deci-sion that does not respect the reference values represented by the political forces that have in turn been part of the ruling majorities. The assumption of this paper is that the financial and regulatory consolidation path of the "lawful game" provides, both from the governmental and cultural viewpoint, a privileged indi-cation to describe the depoliticization of the Second Italian Republic compared to the conflict that should have raged within it as a competitive democracy. From the government viewpoint, the elected institutions renounced the political direction of the field to support the neo-liberal axioms that consider the accuracy of public accounting, the encouragement of consumption and the transfer of public assets to private capitals as three indisputable methods to pursue economic growth. From a cultural viewpoint, the silent consensus of Italian voters for gambling seems to reflect a more general consensus for the "chance" factor, the tolerance for uncertainty that deeply per-meates Italy as the other neo-capitalist societies.References
AA. VV (2017), Sintesi della normativa e della giurisprudenza in materia di gioco d’azzardo e ludopatia. Avviso Pubblico. Revised March 27, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017 (http://www.avvisopubblico.it/home/documentazione/gioco-dazzardo/sintesi-della-normativa-in-materia-di-gioco-dazzardo-e-ludopatia/)
Bauman Z. (1996), “From Pilgrim to Tourist – or a short History of Identity” in Hall S., du Gay P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity, London: Sage
Bauman Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press
Beck U. (1996), “Risk Society Revisited: theory, politics and research programmes” in
Adam B., van Loon J. (eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond, London: Sage, pp. 211–229
Beckert J., Lutter M. (2008), “The Inequality of Fair Play. Lottery Gambling and Social Stratification in Germany”, European Sociological Review, 25 (4): 475-488
Berger P., Luckmann T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality, London: Penguin Books
Cosgrave J. F. (ed. 2006), The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader, New York: Routledge
Custodero A. (2013), Stop ai nuovi videopoker. Caos al Senato. Revised September 6, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017
Dotti M., Esposito M. (eds. 2016), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO
Fiasco M. (2016), “Sistemi di regolazione del gioco d’azzardo in Italia”, in Dotti M., Espo-sito M. (eds.), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO, pp. 261-273
Galbiati W. (2013), L'Imu salva i re delle Slot machine. Un condono per tutti gli operatori. Revised September 20, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017
Gallino L. (2011), Finanzcapitalismo. La civiltà del denaro in crisi, Torino: Einaudi
Harvey D. (1990), The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell
Iori M. (2013), Politica e gioco d’azzardo: poche luci e molte ombre. Research report. Re-vised February 11, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017
(http://www.mettiamociingioco.org/download/11022013_IORI.pdf)
Jessop B. (2002), “Globalization and the National State”, in S. Aaronowitz and P. Bratsis, (eds.), Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered, Minneapolis: University of Minneso-ta Press, pp. 185-220
Jessop B. (2009), “The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Globalizing Capital and Their Impact on State Power and Democracy”, in Rosa H., Scheuerman W.E. (eds.), High-Speed So-ciety, University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press, pp. 135-158
La Repubblica (1992), Respirano i conti pubblici. Revised December 11, 1993. Retrieved April 15, 2017
La Repubblica (1993), Fisco ricco con i giochi. Revised august 20, 1993. Retrieved April 15, 2017
La Repubblica (2002a), Decreto omnibus e videopoker, il governo ritira l'emendamento. Repubblica.it. Revised July 18, 2002. Retrieved April 15, 2017
(http://www.repubblica.it/online/economia/omnibus/omnibus/omnibus.html?ref=search)
La Repubblica (2002b), Il Fisco deve avere un’etica. Revised July 19, 2002. Retrieved April 15, 2017
Leclerc-Olive M. (2005), Délibération et décision: l’espace public disqualifié par le calcul économique. Une approche critique de la théorie probabiliste classique. Revised No-vember 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2017 (fr.pekea-fr.org/Rennes/T-Leclerc-Olive.doc)
Lo Verde F. (2013), “Alimentare sogni, destrutturare speranze. Politiche di offerta e di-namica della domanda di gioco aleatorio nell’Italia contemporanea”, Sociologia del Lavoro, 132: 79-96
Lyng S. (ed. 2005), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking. New York: Routledge
Macry P. (1997), Giocare la vita. Storia del lotto a Napoli tra Sette e Ottocento, Roma: Donzelli
Magatti M. (2008), Libertà immaginaria. Le illusioni del capitalismo tecno-nichilista, Fel-trinelli: Milano
Marquard O. (1986), Apologie des Zufälligen: philosophische Studien, Leipzig: Reclam
Nibert D. (2006) [2000], “State Lotteries and the Legitimation of Inequality” in Cosgrave J. F. (ed.), The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 319-338
Pedroni M. (2014), “The «banker» state and the «responsible» enterprises. Capital con-version strategies in the field of public legal gambling”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 1: 71-98
Poulantzas N. (1978), State, Power, Socialism, London: Verso.
Povoledo E. (2013), Fears of Social Breakdown as Gambling Explodes in Italy. Revised De-cember 28, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017
Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1997) [1996], End of Certainty, London: Free Press
Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Ma: Belknap
Reith G. (1999), The Age of Chance: Gambling in Western Culture, London/New York: Routledge
Sarti S., Triventi M. (2012), “Il gioco d'azzardo: l'iniquità di una tassa volontaria. La rela-zione tra posizione socio-economica e propensione al gioco”, Stato e Mercato, 3: 503-534
Scheuerman W. E. (2000), “The Economic State of Emergency”, Cardozo Law Review, 21: 1869-1890
Schüll N. D. (2014), Addiction by Design. Machine Gambling in Las Vegas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Segatori A. (2016), “Libertà” in Dotti M., Esposito M. (eds.), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO, pp. 173-177
Sennett R. (2006), The Culture of the New Capitalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Taleb N. (2007), The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, New York: The Random House
Tizian G., Tonacci F. (eds. 2013), “Criminal Jackpot”, La Repubblica – L’Espresso. Revised February 21, 2013. Retrivied April 15, 2017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with PACO agree to the Creative Commons Attribution-Non commercial-Share alike 3.0 Italian License
Copyrights of each article are hold by the University of Salento.
PACO allows author(s) to retain publishing rights under permission of the Editorial Staff. But Authors are requested to always indicate that the first version of the article has been published in "Partecipazione e conflitto".
