Observing War, Interpreting Strategy: Russian Strategic Culture and the Politics of learning meaningful lessons
Keywords:
Strategic Culture, Lesson Learned, Change, RussiaAbstract
This essay reviews Dimitri Minic’s Pensée et culture stratégiques russe. Du contournement de la lutte armée à la guerre en Ukraine and situates it within debates on strategic culture, expertise, and lesson-drawing. Minic’s analysis of over 1,200 Russian-language sources reconstructs the revisionist–traditionalist divide that has reshaped Russian conceptions of war and highlights how non-material factors—worldviews, myths, and doctrinal reinterpretations—contribute to strategic thinking. The book’s strengths lie in its systematic engagement with domestic debates and the empirical breadth of its evidence, though its dialogue with wider political science literature and treatment of civil–military relations remain limited. Extending the discussion, the essay links Minic’s findings to current debates on battlefield transparency, analogical reasoning, and the extraction of lessons from conflict. It argues that in-depth contextual expertise on ideational factors is indispensable for avoiding misinterpretation, making strategic culture analysis a critical resource for both scholars and policymakers.References
AAH. (2023). Australia’s China Knowledge Capability. Australian Academy of Humanities. https://humanities.org.au/our-work/projects/australias-china-knowledge-capability/
Agacinski, D. (2018). Expertise and democracy: Coping with mistrust. France Stratégie. https://www.strategie-plan.gouv.fr/en/publications/expertise-democratie-faire-defiance
Allan, D., Bohr, A., Boulègue, M., Giles, K., Gould-Davies, N., Hanson, P., Lough, J., Lutsevych, O., Mallinson, K., Marin, A., Nixey, J., Noble, B., Petrov, N., Schulmann, E., Sherr, J., Wolczuk, K., & Wood, A. (2021). Myths and misconceptions in the debate on Russia: How they affect Western policy, and what can be done (Russia and Eurasia Program). Chatham House.
Anand, V. (2020). Revisiting the Discourse on Strategic Culture: An Assessment of the Conceptual Debates. Strategic Analysis, 44(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2020.1787684
Angstrom, J., & Honig, J. W. (2012). Regaining Strategy: Small Powers, Strategic Culture, and Escalation in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(5), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2012.70696
Audinet, M. (2021). Le Lion, l’Ours et les Hyènes: Acteurs, pratiques et récits de l’influence informationnelle russe en Afrique subsaharienne francophone. Étude de l’IRSEM, 83, 69–85.
Audinet, M., & Dreyfus, E. (2022). La Russie au Mali, une présence bicéphale. Institut de Recherche Stratégique de l’École Militaire (IRSEM).
Becker, J., & Malesky, E. (2017). The continent or the “grand large”? Strategic culture and operational burden-sharing in NATO. International Studies Quarterly, 61(1), 163–180.
Berger, T. U. (1998). Cultures of antimilitarism. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/1396/cultures-antimilitarism?srsltid=AfmBOop1zt9pIof6sl_RZwu9PL_DMnrKTJDz2ZEuFOP9HlbFdFx4pXSv
Borozna, A. (2022). The Role of Strategic Culture and Threat Perception in Foreign Policy Formation. In A. Borozna (Ed.), The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy Assertiveness (pp. 7–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83590-3_2
Brooks, R. A. (2019). Integrating the civil–military relations subfield. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 379–398.
Calcara, A., Gilli, A., Gilli, M., Marchetti, R., & Zaccagnini, I. (2022). Why drones have not revolutionized war: The enduring hider-finder competition in air warfare. International Security, 46(4), 130–171.
Calcara, A., Zaccagnini, I., Gilli, M., & Gilli, A. (2023). Military drones, air defence, and the hider-finder competition in air warfare. Defense & Security Analysis, 39(2), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2023.2178541
Carlsnaes, W. (2008). Actors, structures, and foreign policy analysis. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (pp. 85–100). OUP.
Chau, J., & Wang, A. (2023, January 12). “I’ve been attacked… not with facts and logic, but personally”: John Mearsheimer on the War in Ukraine. Oxford Political Review. https://oxfordpoliticalreview.com/2023/01/12/ive-been-attacked-not-with-facts-and-logic-but-personally-john-mearsheimer-on-the-war-in-ukraine/
Choi, K. (1996). An Approach to a Common Form of Defense White Paper. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 8(1), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10163279609464334
Coticchia, F., & Di Giulio, M. (2025). What makes paradigms last? A study of defense policy change in Germany and Italy (1989–2022). Journal of European Public Policy, 32(7), 1831–1860. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2397134
Dian, M., Moro, F. N., & Coticchia, F. (2023). Reluctant Remilitarisation. Transforming the Armed Forces in Germany, Italy and Japan After the Cold War. Edinburgh University Press. https://cris.unibo.it/handle/11585/945095
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
Dyson, T. (2019). The military as a learning organisation: Establishing the fundamentals of best-practice in lessons-learned. Defence Studies, 19(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1573637
ECA. (2024). Special report 24/2024: EU Civil service. European Court of Auditors. http://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-24
Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331724
Farrell, T. (2010). Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–2009. Journal of Strategic Studies, 33(4), 567–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2010.489712
Feaver, P. (2017). Civil–military relations and policy: A sampling of a new wave of scholarship. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 325–342.
Feaver, P. D. (2003). Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Harvard University Press.
Fox, A. C. (2024). Minimalist strategy: Conflict delegation and proxy use on transparent battlefields. Comparative Strategy, 43(5), 524–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2024.2383150
Fuller, W. C. (2008). What is a military lesson? In Strategic Studies (pp. 44–60). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203928462-9/military-lesson-william-fuller-jr
GAO. (2025). Federal Workforce: OPM Needs to Take Additional Actions to Improve the Federal Early Career Talent Pipeline | U.S. GAO. U.S. Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-106658
Gasparyan, A., & Duarte, P. A. B. (2024). Rethinking the low profile: The evolving stance of China’s strategic culture. Comparative Strategy, 43(6), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2024.2409038
Girard, P. (2008). Conspiracies and visions of conspiracies in France and Italy after the Second World War. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’histoire, 15(6), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507480802500707
Girardet, R. (1990). Mythes et mythologies politiques. Seuil.
Göransson, M. B. (2024). Russia’s thinking on new wars and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Defence Studies, 24(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2024.2365214
Götz, E., & Staun, J. (2022). Why Russia attacked Ukraine: Strategic culture and radicalized narratives. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633
Gray, C. S. (2014). Strategy and defence planning: Meeting the challenge of uncertainty. Oxford University Press, USA.
Hackett, J., Childes, N., & Barrie, D. (2022). If New Looks could kill: Russia’s military capability in 2022 (Military Balance Blog). IISS. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2022/02/if-new-looks-could-kill-russias-military-capability-in-2022/
Harig, C., Jenne, N., & Ruffa, C. (2022). Operational experiences, military role conceptions, and their influence on civil-military relations.
Haunschild, R., Williams, K., & Bornmann, L. (2025). The influence of public policy and administration expertise on policy: An empirical study. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2024D000000042
Hopf, T. (2010). The logic of habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110363502
Hornsey, M. J., Bierwiaczonek, K., Sassenberg, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2023). Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(2), 85–97.
IfG. (2024). Whitehall Monitor 2024: Part 1. Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/whitehall-monitor-2024/part-1
Johnston, A. I. (1998). Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history (Vol. 75). Princeton University Press.
Khong, Y. F. (2022). How not to learn from history. International Affairs, 98(5), 1737–1762.
Kohn, R. H. (1997). How Democracies Control the Military. Journal of Democracy, 8(4), 140–153.
Kukkola, J. (2023). The rise and fall of the Russian strategy of indirect actions in Ukraine. National Defence University Working Pap. https://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/186961
Kunertova, D., & Herzog, S. (2024). Emerging and Disruptive Technologies Transform, but Do Not Lift, the Fog of War–Evidence from Russia’s War on Ukraine. Russia’s War Against Ukraine–Complexity of Contemporary Clausewitzian War, 2024, 146–161.
Kuzio, T. (2024). Nine Things Western Analysts Got Wrong About Russia and Its Invasion of Ukraine (No. Volume: 21 Issue: 33; Eurasia Daily Monitor). The Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/program/nine-things-western-experts-got-wrong-about-russia-and-its-invasion-of-ukraine/
Laketa, S. (2019). “Even if it didn’t happen, it’s true”: The fantasy of geopolitics in the “post-truth” era. Emotion, Space and Society, 31, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.01.002
Lantis, J. S. (2009). Strategic Culture: From Clausewitz to Constructivism. In J. L. Johnson, K. M. Kartchner, & J. A. Larsen (Eds.), Strategic Culture and Weapons of Mass Destruction (pp. 33–52). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230618305_3
Lantis, J. S., & Howlett, D. (2016). Strategic culture. Strategy in the Contemporary World, 89–92.
Laruelle, M., & Limonier, K. (2021). Beyond “hybrid warfare”: A digital exploration of Russia’s entrepreneurs of influence.
Lau, S. (2022, March 9). ‘We told you so!’ How the West didn’t listen to the countries that know Russia best. Politico.
Laugen Haaland, T. (2016). The Limits to Learning in Military Operations: Bottom-up Adaptation in the Norwegian Army in Northern Afghanistan, 2007–2012. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(7), 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1202823
Lebow, R. N. (2000). What’s so different about a counterfactual? World Politics, 52(4), 550–585.
Mackinnon, A. (2025, August 13). No experts in the room: Donald Trump to meet Vladimir Putin after loss of Russia specialists. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/89f39aea-30dd-4481-93c8-842576dff3fc
Mahnken, T. G. (2020). Learning the lessons of modern war. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=it&lr=&id=IJHgDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=learning+the+lessons+of+modern+war&ots=W6ywiRa8i2&sig=IxmKuJMrEcH0JImVTQ1HFV74j_M
McDermott, R. N., & Bartles, L. C. C. K. (2023). An Assessment of the Initial Period of War: Russia-Ukraine 2022, Part Two. FMSO Foreign Perspectives Briefs. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charles-Bartles/publication/371411326_An_Assessment_of_the_Initial_Period_of_War_Russia-Ukraine_2022_Part_II/links/64828214d702370600dc48e5/An-Assessment-of-the-Initial-Period-of-War-Russia-Ukraine-2022-Part-II.pdf
Néron-Bancel, P., & Garnier, G. (2024). “At the Other Side of the Hill”: The Benefits and False Promises of Battlefield Transparency | Ifri (No. 118; Études de l’IFRI). IFRI. https://www.ifri.org/en/studies/other-side-hill-benefits-and-false-promises-battlefield-transparency?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Oelrich, I., van Hooft, P., & Biddle, S. (2024). Anti-satellite warfare, proliferated satellites, and the future of space-based military surveillance. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(6–7), 916–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379398
Pion-Berlin, D., & Dudley, D. (2020). Civil-military relations: What is the state of the field. Handbook of Military Sciences, 1–22.
Recordati-Koen, M. (2024). Il miraggio della strategia nel discorso geopolitico italiano: Una critica epistemologica. Quaderni di scienza politica, 1, 51–78. https://doi.org/10.48271/113275
Renz, B. (2024). Western Estimates of Russian Military Capabilities and the Invasion of Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 71(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2023.2253359
Roth, A. (2025, August 13). Trump alone in a room with Putin is a recipe for disaster – just look to their last meeting. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/13/trump-putin-meeting-alaska
Ruffa, C. (2017). Military cultures and force employment in peace operations. Security Studies, 26(3), 391-422.
Schmitt, O. (2018). When are strategic narratives effective? The shaping of political discourse through the interaction between political myths and strategic narratives. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1448925
Schmitt, O. (2024). Préparer la guerre: Stratégie, innovation et puissance militaire à l’époque contemporaine: Schmitt, Olivier: Amazon.it: Libri. PUF.
Schwarz, E. (2025). From blitzkrieg to blitzscaling: Assessing the impact of venture capital dynamics on military norms. Finance and Society, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/fas.2024.18
Sharp, J. P. (1993). Publishing American identity: Popular geopolitics, myth and The Reader’s Digest. Political Geography, 12(6), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(93)90001-N
Shultz, R. H., & Brimelow, B. (2022). Russia’s Potemkin Army. Modern War Institute. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/russias-potemkin-army/, https://mwi.westpoint.edu/russias-potemkin-army/
Snyder, J. L. (2023). The Concept of Strategic Culture. In Strategic Culture (s) in Latin America (pp. 19–28). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003142508-3/concept-strategic-culture-jack-snyder
Strobel, W. P., Nakashima, E., Miller, G., & DeYoung, K. (2025, August 27). Trump, Gabbard fired top CIA Russia expert days after Alaska summit. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/08/27/cia-officer-russia-trump-gabbard/
The Australian. (2024). China studies in crisis, say scholars. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/china-studies-in-crisis-say-scholars-in-letter-to-australian-research-council/news-story/2ae91e1c0864a51769b25108892f3ef2
Tuathail, G. Ó. (1999). Understanding critical geopolitics: Geopolitics and risk society. The Journal of Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399908437756
US COGR. (2025). CCP Political Warfare: Federal Agencies Urgently Need a Government-Wide Strategy (US Committee on Oversight and Government Reform). https://oversight.house.gov/report/staff-report-exposing-the-ccps-destructive-political-warfare-and-influence-operation/
US State Department. (2020). Pillars of Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem. Global Engagement Center (GEC).
Uz Zaman, R. (2009). Strategic Culture: A “Cultural” Understanding of War. Comparative Strategy, 28(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930802679785
Vagle, B. A., & Brooks, S. G. (2025). Command of Commerce: America’s Enduring Economic Power Advantage over China. Oxford University Press.
van der Vorm, M. (2021). The Crucible of War: What Do We Know about Military Adaptation? Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 12(1), 197–209.
Welker, B. (2025). Geopolitical mythmaking: A narrative study of German far-right media discourse on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2524372
Zelikow, P. (2015). The Nature of History’s Lessons’. The Power of the Past: History and Statecraft, 281–309.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jean-Marie Reure

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain all rights to the original work without any restrictions
Authors who publish with Interdisciplinary Political Studies agree to the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
License for published content
You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
