Steps Forward and Backward on Abortion Rights in Advanced Democracies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20398573v11n1p5Abstract
There is no abstract for special issue introductionsReferences
Atay, H., & Levrier, G. (2025). Constitutionalization of abortion in France: Looking beyond the vote. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Bakhru, T. S. (Ed.). (2019). Reproductive justice and sexual rights: Transnational perspectives. Routledge.
Barone, A., Bonu Rosenkranz, G., Markelj, L., & Smrdelj, R. (2025). Feminist responses to anti-abortion attacks. Building democratic innovations in informal fields. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Berro Pizzarossa, L., Coast, E., Kareithi, W., & Duffy, D. (2025, February). “[E]ven in our fear […] We wanted to do this”: Feminist organising for abortion in Africa as palimpsestic. Culture, Health and Sexuality. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/126957/
Bojovic, N., & Stanisljevic, J. (2024). Constitutional enshrinement as a way of safeguarding abortion rights: The case of France. Health Policy, 147, 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105124
Calasanti, A., Fernandez Anderson, C., & Kay, T. (2024). Research ethics and methods in shifting policy climates: The case of abortion rights in the United States and Latin America. Politics & Gender, 20(4), 1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X24000230
Castle, S. (2025, June 17). Lawmakers vote to decriminalize abortions for women in England and Wales. The New York Times, World. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/17/world/europe/uk-abortion-law.html
Cioffi, A., Cecannecchia, C., Cioffi, F., Bolino, G., & Rinaldi, R. (2022). Abortion in Europe: Recent legislative changes and risk of inequality. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 33(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-200095
Coen-Sanchez, K., Ebenso, B., El-Mowafi, I. M., & et al. (2022). Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders. Reproductive Health, 19, 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y
Cozzi, A. O., De Giorgi, E., & Ripamonti, G. M. (2025). 45 years of Law 194 in Italy: How does regional politics impact on the right to access abortion? Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Daby, M., & Moseley, M. W. (2024). Mobilizing for abortion rights in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
De Zordo, S. (2017). “‘Good doctors do not object’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on conscientious objection to abortion care and their engagement with pro-abortion rights protests in Italy.” In S. De Zordo, J. Mishtal, & L. Anton (Eds.), A fragmented landscape: Abortion governance and protest logics in Europe (Vol. 20, Protest, Culture and Society). Berghahn.
Dietze, G., & Roth, J. (Eds.). (2020). Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond. Transcript.
Dubel, I. (2025). Women make waves: A pendulum swing between Dutch transnational and domestic abortion activism. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Ertan, S., & Yaman, S. (2025). Abortion laws in democracies: Analyzing macro-level determinants and their impact. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Fangen, K., & Skjelsbæk, I. (2020). Special issue on gender and the far right. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 21(4), 411–415.
Fernández Anderson, C. (2020). Fighting for abortion rights in Latin America: Social movements, state allies and institutions. Routledge.
Fiala, C., Agostini, A., Bombas, T., Lertxundi, R., Lubusky, M., Parachini, M., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2022). Abortion: Legislation and statistics in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 27(4), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2057469
Gannon, P. (2023, April 25). ‘This is a law about life not a law about death’: Conscientious objection and its effects on Italian doctors. [Conference presentation]. Joint Session of Workshops, European Consortium for Political Research, Toulouse, FR. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/67088
Gannon, P., & Pullan, D. (2025a). “In Italy, we have a saying: make the law and you will find a way to cheat it”: The regionalized implementation of Italian abortion policies. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Gannon, P., & Pullan, D. (2025b). Sanctuaries, islands, and deserts: A typology of regionalized abortion policy. (MPIfG Discussion Paper 25/1). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0010-F138-F
Giovannelli, I., Mannarini, T., Spaccatini, F., & Pacilli, M. G. (2023). Fighting for abortion rights: Strategies aimed at managing stigma in a group of Italian pro-choice activists. Feminism & Psychology, 33(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221106653
Graff, A., Kapur, R., & Walters, S. D. (2019). Introduction: Gender and the rise of the global right. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1086/701152
Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Lavizzari, A. (2024). The anti-gender movement and the populist radical right in Italy: A symbiotic relationship. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(aop), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088Y2024D000000047
Małyszko, A. M. (2025). Policing abortion in Poland: The role of front-line law enforcement officials in shaping anti-abortion policy. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Nemtoi, G. (2024). Constitutionalisation of the right to abortion. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/11.1/216
Nossek, A., Jung, A., Sthamer, E., & Dubiski, J. (2025). Is abortion dividing society? Differentiated attitudes and contextual factors. A quantitative vignette study. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Ortega, P. M. (2024, November 14). Progress and pushback in Mexico’s fight for abortion rights. O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. https://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/progress-and-pushback-in-mexicos-fight-for-abortion-rights/
Pullan, D. (2024). Doctors’ rights vs. patients’ rights: Analyzing the implementation of Italian abortion policy in Puglia. In The gap between abortion policy and abortion access in Europe: A mixed-methods comparative study (Cumulative Thesis). University of Cologne. https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_3614737
Pullan, D., & Gannon, P. (2024). Between the Church and the State: Catholic and European influences on abortion governance in Italy and beyond. Journal of Religion in Europe, 17(3), 262–292. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10107
Pullan, D., & Trail, M. (2025). Evaluating the intersection of attitudes on foster care and abortion among US American evangelicals. Interdisciplinary Political Studies.
Reuterswärd, C., Zetterberg, P., Thapar-Björkert, S., & Molyneux, M. (2011). Abortion law reforms in Colombia and Nicaragua: Issue networks and opportunity contexts. Development and Change, 42(3), 805–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01714.x
Roth, C. (2023). Abortion access in the Americas: A hemispheric and historical approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1284737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284737
Center for Reproductive Rights. (2025). World abortion laws map. New York, NY. https://reproductiverights.org/worldabortionlaws
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all rights to the original work without any restrictions
Authors who publish with Interdisciplinary Political Studies agree to the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Italy (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT).
License for published content
You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
