Republicans vs Democrats. A Comparative Look at Congress Foreign Policy in the MENA Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20398573v9n2p129Keywords:
USA, foreign policy, Congress, MENA regionAbstract
This paper compares US foreign policies of Republican and Democratic members of Congress in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) through 126 laws from 1973 to 2017 and in the light of the concepts of ‘soft,’ ‘hard’, and ‘smart’ powers. The analyses of the laws led to the following findings. Initially, regardless of their party affiliations, all members of Congress agreed on protecting and strengthening Israel through using means of soft and hard powers. Additionally, Republicans are more likely to use means of hard power than Democrats, especially military force. Democrats rely, in fact, more on diplomatic and strategic cooperation. They are also more likely to apply the concept of ‘smart power’, well balancing hard and soft power means. By contrast, Republicans’ resort to hard power is widely unbalanced with that of soft power. Furthermore, they tend to be keener on looking for economic opportunities in the region than Democrats do. Finally, the paper finds out that Democrats are more open and lenient than Republicans in terms of their immigration policies toward the MENA region’s citizens. These findings are generally in line with the available literature. However, the paper’s originality lies in the methodology used to attain them.References
American Political Science Association (1950). Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association.
American Political Science Review, 1(15).
Baldwin, D. A. (2013). Power and International Relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations (pp. 273-297). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.
Barber, B. (2002). Andrew Natsios: getting USAID on its feet. Foreign Service Journal, 79(9), 20–27. https://afsa.org/sites/default/files/fsj-2002-09-september_0.pdf
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in International Politics. International Organization, 59 (1), 39–75.
http://www.rochelleterman.com/ir/sites/default/files/Barnett%20and%20Duvall%202005.pdf
Berger, L. (2012). Guns, butter, and human rights—The congressional politics of U.S. aid to Egypt. American Politics Research, 40(4), 603–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11433767
Bums, J. M. (1963). The Deadlock of Democracy: Four Party Politics in America. Prentice-Hall.
Carothers, T. (2009). Revitalizing U.S. democracy assistance: The challenge of USAID. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Last accessed 10 November 2019, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/revitalizing_democracy_assistance.pdf
Carr, H. E. (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper and Row.
Carroll, H. E. (1966). The House of Representatives and Foreign Policy. Boston: Little Brown & Co.
Corneille, F., & Shiffman, J. (2004). Scaling-up participation at USAID. Public Administration and Development, 24(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.307
Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., & Aall, P. R. (2007). Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. US Institute of Peace Press.
Dangerfield, G. (1989). The Era of Good Feelings. I. R. Dee Publisher.
Gallarotti, G. M. (2010). Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations: A Synthesis of Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism. Cambridge University Press.
Gray, C. S. & U.S. Strategic Studies Institute Army War College (2011). Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century. Carlisle, Pa.: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Last accessed 23 January 2022, https://www.loc.gov/item/2023692740/.
Hallett, B. (2012). Declaring War: Congress, the President, and What the Constitution Does Not
Say. Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, A. (1787). The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection For the Independent Journal. Federalist Paper No. 9, Yale Law School: Lillian Goldman Law Library. 21 September, last accessed 10 November 2019, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed09.asp
Hassanien, M. R. (2010). United States Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: Consistencies Or Conflicts with Norms in the Middle East? Kluwer Law International.
Hofstadter, R. (1970). The Idea of a Party System: The Rise of Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780–1840. University of California Press.
Ingram, G. (2018). Erratic budget processes threaten US foreign aid. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, last accessed 12 March 2022, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/06/04/erratic-budget-processes-threaten-us-foreign-aid
Lawson, S. (2015). Theories of International Relations. Contending Approaches to World Politics. Polity Press.
McClory, J. (2011). The New Persuaders II. A 2011 Global Ranking of Soft Power. Institute for Government, last accessed 19 January 2024, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/The%20New%20PersuadersII_0.pdf
Madison, J. (1787). The Same Subject Continued: The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection. Federal Paper No. 10, 23 November, last accessed 10 November 2019, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed10.asp .
McMillan, M. E. (2016). From the First World War to the Arab Spring. What's Really Going On in the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgenthau, H. J., & Thompson, K. W. (2006). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Peking University Press.
Merriam, C. E. (1923). The American Party System. New York: MacMillan.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153-171.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. Oxford University Press.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2009). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. PublicAffairs.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2010). The Powers to Lead. Oxford University Press.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2012). Smart Power. Edition Laterza.
Nye, J.S. Jr. (2015). Is the American Century Over?. Polity Press.
Nye, J.S. Jr., & Armitage, R. L. (2007). CSIS Commission on Smart Power. A smarter, more secure America. Center for Strategic and International Studies, last accessed 19 January 2024, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/csissmartpowerreport.pdf
Ohnesorge, H.W. (2019). Soft Power: The Forces of Attraction in International Relations. Springer International Publishing.
Ornstein, N., Mann, T., Malbin, M., Rugg, A. and Wakeman, R. (2014). Vital statistics on
Congress: 1855 to 2014. Brookings Institution, last accessed 13 November 2019,
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Vital-Statistics-Full-Data-Set.pdf.
Parmar, I., & Cox, M. (2010). Soft Power and US Foreign Policy: Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Taylor & Francis.
Richards, A. R., & Omidvar, I. (2014). Muslims and American Popular Culture. ABC=CLIO
Schattschneider, E. (1942). Party Government. Holt Rinehart.
Smeltz, D., Daalder, I., Friedhoff, K., Kafura, C., & Brendan Helm B. (2020). Divided We Stand. Democrats and Republicans Diverge on US Foreign Policy. Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy Chicago Council Survey of American Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy, Lester Crown Center on US Foreign Policy, last accessed 2 August 2023, https://globalaffairs.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/report_2020ccs_americadivided_0.pdf.
Sobhy, S. (2005). The U.S. Military Presence in the Middle East: Issues and Prospects. U.S. Army War College
Sundquist, J. L. (1992). Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Brookings Institution Press.
U.S. Constitution. Art. 1.
Viotti, P.R., & Kauppi, M.V (2012). International Relations Theory. Pearson Education.
Washington, G. (1796). Farewell Address 1796. Yale Law School: Lillian Goldman Law Library. 19 September, last accessed 10 November 2019, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp .
Westphal, A. (1942). The House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Columbia University Press.
Wilson, E. J. (2008). Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312618
Yoo, J. (2008). The Powers of War and Peace. The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11. University of Chicago.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all rights to the original work without any restrictions
Authors who publish with Interdisciplinary Political Studies agree to the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Italy (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IT).
License for published content
You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; remix, transform, and build upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
