Pragmatics through argumentative press articles. From theory to practice

Autori

  • Rosalia Di Nisio Università degli Studi Udine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v39p97

Parole chiave:

argumentation, speech act, macrospeech act, audience, manoeuvering.

Abstract

The paper reports on a thirty-hour teaching module of English at the University of Udine in the second year of the degree course in Lingue e Letterature Straniere. The main goal was to raise the students’ awareness of how discourse and pragmatics provide tools useful to the discovery in an argumentative press article of the writer’s strategies to persuade the addressee and the role of the addressee in shaping language and content choices. The paper illustrates the methodology that was followed. It is divided into two sections. The first one contains a presentation of academic research related to the main themes covered in the course, from the layout of argumentation (Toulmin 2003, p. 87) to the arguer’s “strategic maneuvering” (van Eemeren 2010, p. 41) to persuade the “audience” (Perelman, Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969, pp. 5-8, 19). The second section describes the syllabus of the module to facilitate the comprehension of concepts from discourse and pragmatics. An overview of five workshops from the ten that characterized the module is included. A synthesis of a mini-lecture, aimed at connecting the students’ analysis of the articles to the academic research, concludes the presentation of each workshop.

 

Biografia autore

Rosalia Di Nisio, Università degli Studi Udine

Docente a contratto presso il Dipartimento di Lingue e Letterature Stranierer dell'Università degli Studi di Udine

Riferimenti bibliografici

Aristotle 2010, Rhetoric, Cosimo Inc., New York.

Austin J.L. 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Ausubel D.P. 1960, The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of Meaningful Verbal Material, “Journal of Educational Psychology” 51 [5], pp. 267-272.

Bakhtin M.M. 1986, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin.

Bruner K.F. 1942, Of Psychological Writing: Being Some Valedictory Remarks on Style, in “Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” 37 [1], pp. 52-70.

Di Nisio R. 2016, Pragmatics through Literature. A Teaching Experience, in “Lingue Antiche e Moderne” [5] (2016), pp. 157-183.

Eemeren F.H. van. 2010, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, J. Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Eemeren F.H. van and Grootendorst, R. 1983, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

Grice H.P. 1975, Logic and Conversation, in Cole P. and Morgan J.L. (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41-58.

Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca L. 1969, The New Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.

Searle J. 1969, Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; A Classification of Illocutionary Acts, in “Language in Society” 5 [1] (1976), pp. 1-23.

Thompson A. 2009, Critical Thinking, Routledge, London/New York.

Toulmin S. 1958 (2003), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Van Dijk T.A. 1980, Macrostructures, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, New Jersey;

Van Dijk T.A. 2000, Ideology and Discourse - A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Pomeu Fadra University, Barcelona.

Widdowson H.G. 2007, Discourse Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Yule G. 1996, Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

21-12-2020

Fascicolo

Sezione

STUDI - Articles